I was part of an online group project in a university course where we had to create a marketing plan for a new product. Initially, everyone was enthusiastic and contributing ideas. However, as the deadline approached, things started to fall apart.
What went wrong:
* Unequal contribution: Two group members were doing the bulk of the work, while the others were mostly absent from online meetings and barely participated in the document we were collaboratively editing.
* Lack of communication: Some members wouldn't respond to emails or messages in our group chat for days, making it difficult to coordinate tasks and get feedback.
* Conflicting ideas: When the more active members tried to take the lead and make decisions, the less involved members suddenly reappeared with completely different ideas, leading to arguments and delays.
Solution:
In hindsight, several solutions could have helped:
* Establish clear roles and expectations from the start: We should have assigned specific tasks to each member, set deadlines for each stage of the project, and agreed on a communication protocol.
* Regular check-ins: Short, frequent online meetings could have helped us track progress, address issues early on, and ensure everyone was on the same page.
* Mediation or intervention: If disagreements arose, we could have involved the instructor or teaching assistant to help mediate or provide guidance.
* Utilize collaboration tools effectively: Project management tools could have helped us visualize tasks, track progress, and ensure accountability.
Outcome:
Unfortunately, at the time, we didn't implement these solutions effectively. The two active members ended up completing most of the project, submitting a decent plan but feeling resentful. The other members received the same grade despite their minimal involvement, which wasn't fair. The experience was frustrating and highlighted the importance of clear communication, defined roles, and proactive problem-solving in online collaborations.